What is the high-side terminal result of the zero-cost95/100/107 call butterfly?
Reveal the worked answer
−200 per standard 1:−2:1 unit before costs.
The unequal wings leave a two-point upper-tail loss.
Can you defend every risk in the ticket?
Read first: Read a contract and its premium, Rights, obligations and expiration, Defined payoff risk is not margin, Read the whole multi-leg ticket
An advanced trade is ready for analysis when its risk can be explained simply: what is bought and sold, why that combination fits the view, what it costs and how it fails. More legs do not relax that requirement.
This reading check is not authorization to trade or a production-software acceptance certificate.
Identify same-expiry versus multi-expiry valuation. For terminal payoffs, sum signed intrinsic and cash flows with the correct multiplier. For calendars, revalue the surviving option and state IV assumptions. Check tail slopes to expose uncovered risk.
Then consider operational paths: exercise, assignment, partial fills, changing margin and unavailable exits.
Stress spot, time and the IV surface. Explain which Greek dominates now and which can dominate later. Reproduce one adverse result and its cash needs. Record what evidence would invalidate the idea.
A structure with a zero opening debit still needs full risk analysis.
These are complete fictional reading examples, not live opportunities. Terminal identities assume the stated common settlement. Multi-expiry values require a surviving-leg model. Costs, assignment and financing can alter realized outcomes; a mathematical bound alone does not guarantee the same operational loss path.
A fictional broken-wing call butterfly buys 95, sells two 100 and buys 107 for zero net premium. Above 107 its intrinsic sum is (S−95)−2(S−100)+(S−107)=−2, or−200 for 100 units.
Zero cash paid did not create a free trade. The chart displays the asymmetric terminal region, and the dedicated ticket lesson shows every leg. Costs make the zero-entry label even less descriptive.
Vertical: Broken-wing butterfly terminal P/L (USD)
Horizontal: Underlying at common expiry (USD)
| Underlying at common expiry (USD) | Fictional example |
|---|---|
| 85 | 0 |
| 86 | 0 |
| 87 | 0 |
| 88 | 0 |
| 89 | 0 |
| 90 | 0 |
| 91 | 0 |
| 92 | 0 |
| 93 | 0 |
| 94 | 0 |
| 95 | 0 |
| 96 | 100 |
| 97 | 200 |
| 98 | 300 |
| 99 | 400 |
| 100 | 500 |
| 101 | 400 |
| 102 | 300 |
| 103 | 200 |
| 104 | 100 |
| 105 | 0 |
| 106 | -100 |
| 107 | -200 |
| 108 | -200 |
| 109 | -200 |
| 110 | -200 |
| 111 | -200 |
| 112 | -200 |
| 113 | -200 |
| 114 | -200 |
| 115 | -200 |
| 116 | -200 |
| 117 | -200 |
| 118 | -200 |
| 119 | -200 |
| 120 | -200 |
The learner trusts a nickname, zero debit or attractive central peak while ignoring the tail. A plot cropped too narrowly can conceal the actual worst case.
Try the question before revealing its answer. These are reading checks, not trading certification or a site completion record.
−200 per standard 1:−2:1 unit before costs.
The unequal wings leave a two-point upper-tail loss.
The learner trusts a nickname, zero debit or attractive central peak while ignoring the tail. A plot cropped too narrowly can conceal the actual worst case.
Explain this risk before treating the example as a decision rule. A correct calculation does not guarantee a favorable market outcome.
Return to the question: Can you defend every risk in the ticket? State the observed facts, the assumptions and the failure condition separately.
External references support definitions and conventions. Worked scenarios and prose are original. No current quotes or dealer inventory are claimed.
Read this lesson as Markdown · Download its JavaScript content module