What does the 100/105 debit vertical earn at expiry 103 with debit 2?
Reveal the worked answer
100 per standard spread before costs.
Intrinsic width achieved is three, minus debit two.
How should the structure match the expected move?
Read first: Read a contract and its premium, Rights, obligations and expiration, Defined payoff risk is not margin, Read the whole multi-leg ticket
A trend thesis expects continuing directional progress, but still needs a plausible magnitude and duration. A long call, debit spread and credit spread do not express that thesis identically.
Choosing a structure first can force the forecast to justify a favorite trade.
A long call retains convex upside but pays for premium and time. A bull-call vertical lowers the initial cost while capping upside. A put credit spread can profit without a large advance but has its own downside and assignment risks.
At-expiry geometry does not describe every interim IV or time response.
State the trend's supporting evidence, the next obstacle and the failure condition. Choose enough time for the thesis and compare attainable reward with actual spread costs.
If price reaches the target early, reconsider what reward remains rather than holding only because the expiry date has not arrived.
Terminal examples use simultaneous intrinsic realization of all stated legs, before unspecified costs. Actual American exercise, assignment, early liquidation and broker handling can create different interim cash needs. These fictional comparisons are education, not orders or personalized investment advice.
One fictional 100 call costs 4.20. A 100/105 bull-call vertical buys that call and sells a 105 call at 2.20, paying 2.00.
At expiry 103 the long call loses 1.20 while the vertical earns 1.00 per unit. At 112 the long call earns 7.80 and the vertical only 3.00. Neither is universally better: the capped structure fits a more limited target. The graph shows the vertical; the ticket lesson contains its leg-by-leg view.
Vertical: Bull-call spread terminal P/L (USD)
Horizontal: Underlying at common expiry (USD)
| Underlying at common expiry (USD) | Fictional example |
|---|---|
| 94 | -200 |
| 95 | -200 |
| 96 | -200 |
| 97 | -200 |
| 98 | -200 |
| 99 | -200 |
| 100 | -200 |
| 101 | -100 |
| 102 | 0 |
| 103 | 100 |
| 104 | 200 |
| 105 | 300 |
| 106 | 300 |
| 107 | 300 |
| 108 | 300 |
| 109 | 300 |
| 110 | 300 |
| 111 | 300 |
| 112 | 300 |
A trader expects a modest move but buys expensive short-dated uncapped premium, or expects an exceptional move but forgets the sold leg caps participation.
Try the question before revealing its answer. These are reading checks, not trading certification or a site completion record.
100 per standard spread before costs.
Intrinsic width achieved is three, minus debit two.
A trader expects a modest move but buys expensive short-dated uncapped premium, or expects an exceptional move but forgets the sold leg caps participation.
Explain this risk before treating the example as a decision rule. A correct calculation does not guarantee a favorable market outcome.
Return to the question: How should the structure match the expected move? State the observed facts, the assumptions and the failure condition separately.
External references support definitions and conventions. Worked scenarios and prose are original. No current quotes or dealer inventory are claimed.
Read this lesson as Markdown · Download its JavaScript content module