If gross discrepancy is about 8.65 points and disadvantage is ten, is net edge positive?
Reveal the worked answer
No.
Implementation costs exceed the modeled gap.
When does a theoretical discrepancy survive implementation?
Read first: What is an equity index future?
Cash-and-carry compares buying and financing a basket with selling its future. Reverse structures use the opposite relationship. These incentives help connect venues, but their classroom arithmetic is simpler than an executable trade.
A theoretical spread is not automatically available profit for every account.
If futures are expensive relative to a feasible financed basket, a participant may buy the basket and sell futures. Funding, expected dividends, borrow, tracking, settlement and execution determine whether the comparison is favorable.
Different participants have different financing and access. A small gross discrepancy can vanish across stock fills or changing futures quotes.
Calculate consistent fair value, then subtract implementation costs and stress uncertain inputs. Confirm dates and basket weights. Do not call an American-option or proxy implementation riskless merely because a terminal identity looks fixed.
For most learners the important idea is linkage, not an invitation to execute institutional arbitrage.
All prices, portfolio values and account balances are fictional. Real contract calendars, broker requirements and available liquidity must be checked for the instrument actually traded. The example's mathematical hedge or payoff is not an execution guarantee.
With the prior model F=5031.347860, suppose a fictional future quotes 5,040. Gross discrepancy is 8.652140 points, or $432.61 per 50-dollar-point equivalent.
If all-in disadvantage is ten points, it exceeds the roughly 8.65-point gross opportunity. The graph subtracts different cost assumptions to expose that threshold.
Vertical: Net modeled discrepancy (points)
Horizontal: Implementation disadvantage (points)
| Implementation disadvantage (points) | Fictional example |
|---|---|
| 0 | 8.65214 |
| 2 | 6.65214 |
| 4 | 4.65214 |
| 6 | 2.65214 |
| 8 | 0.65214 |
| 10 | -1.34786 |
| 12 | -3.34786 |
Using historical yield as exact future dividends or ignoring basket costs can turn a normal pricing difference into an imaginary arbitrage.
Try the question before revealing its answer. These are reading checks, not trading certification or a site completion record.
No.
Implementation costs exceed the modeled gap.
Using historical yield as exact future dividends or ignoring basket costs can turn a normal pricing difference into an imaginary arbitrage.
Explain this risk before treating the example as a decision rule. A correct calculation does not guarantee a favorable market outcome.
Return to the question: When does a theoretical discrepancy survive implementation? State the observed facts, the assumptions and the failure condition separately.
External references support definitions and conventions. Worked scenarios and prose are original. No current quotes or dealer inventory are claimed.
Read this lesson as Markdown · Download its JavaScript content module