What is the 95/105 strangle's terminal loss at 106 with total debit four?
Reveal the worked answer
300 per standard pair.
One call intrinsic minus four paid.
What is being bought when direction is uncertain?
Read first: Read a contract and its premium, Rights, obligations and expiration, Defined payoff risk is not margin, Read the whole multi-leg ticket
Volatility strategies concern the size, path and price of movement rather than only up or down. Long options buy convexity at a cost; short options sell it while taking adverse move risk.
The strategy's name does not establish whether the volatility price is attractive.
A long straddle can benefit from a sufficient move either way, while a strangle pays less but generally needs more distance from its strikes. Short versions reverse cash flows and tail exposure.
For managed Delta-hedged positions, realized path and hedge costs matter; a terminal payoff alone is not the entire volatility-trading return.
State whether the thesis is a large terminal displacement, an IV increase, realized movement available to hedge or a relative-value surface move. These are different propositions.
Compare premium with a defensible scenario and costs, not with IV rank alone. A high percentile can reflect genuinely high risk.
Terminal examples use simultaneous intrinsic realization of all stated legs, before unspecified costs. Actual American exercise, assignment, early liquidation and broker handling can create different interim cash needs. These fictional comparisons are education, not orders or personalized investment advice.
Compare a fictional 100 straddle costing 8.40 with a 95/105 strangle costing four. At expiry 106, straddle P/L is −2.40 and strangle P/L −3 per unit. At 115 they earn 6.60 and six respectively.
Lower initial cost did not make the strangle dominate every outcome. The graph shows the strangle's flat center and outer slopes; the straddle lesson provides the single-vertex comparison.
Vertical: Strangle terminal P/L (USD)
Horizontal: Underlying at common expiry (USD)
| Underlying at common expiry (USD) | Fictional example |
|---|---|
| 85 | 600 |
| 86 | 500 |
| 87 | 400 |
| 88 | 300 |
| 89 | 200 |
| 90 | 100 |
| 91 | 0 |
| 92 | -100 |
| 93 | -200 |
| 94 | -300 |
| 95 | -400 |
| 96 | -400 |
| 97 | -400 |
| 98 | -400 |
| 99 | -400 |
| 100 | -400 |
| 101 | -400 |
| 102 | -400 |
| 103 | -400 |
| 104 | -400 |
| 105 | -400 |
| 106 | -300 |
| 107 | -200 |
| 108 | -100 |
| 109 | 0 |
| 110 | 100 |
| 111 | 200 |
| 112 | 300 |
| 113 | 400 |
| 114 | 500 |
| 115 | 600 |
Assuming all long-volatility trades benefit from any small move ignores the premium and strikes. Treating a high win rate in short vol as safety ignores severity.
Try the question before revealing its answer. These are reading checks, not trading certification or a site completion record.
300 per standard pair.
One call intrinsic minus four paid.
Assuming all long-volatility trades benefit from any small move ignores the premium and strikes. Treating a high win rate in short vol as safety ignores severity.
Explain this risk before treating the example as a decision rule. A correct calculation does not guarantee a favorable market outcome.
Return to the question: What is being bought when direction is uncertain? State the observed facts, the assumptions and the failure condition separately.
External references support definitions and conventions. Worked scenarios and prose are original. No current quotes or dealer inventory are claimed.
Read this lesson as Markdown · Download its JavaScript content module