What is growth after removing 90 of acquired revenue?
Reveal the worked answer
Approximately 1.1%.
(1,000−90−900)/900.
How much growth is repeatable?
Read first: Understand the business
Headline growth can come from units, pricing, acquisitions, currency or timing. These sources have different durability and capital requirements. Strong reported growth can coexist with weak underlying demand.
A useful analysis builds a revenue bridge rather than repeating the top-line percentage.
Separate continuing-business growth from acquired revenue. Distinguish recurring contracts, bookings and recognized sales; none is automatically cash collected. Concentration, credit terms and retention matter where relevant.
Compare like periods and definitions. Seasonality or a changed reporting calendar can distort simple comparisons.
Reconcile the growth explanation with segments, receivables and cash. If receivables grow faster than sales, ask why rather than immediately declaring misconduct.
Determine whether demand, price, mix or acquisition spending supports the forecast. Each needs different evidence.
These are original fictional teaching figures, not a company screen. Actual analysis should use primary disclosures and distinguish management's explanation from your inference. Favorable or unfavorable evidence depends on the specific business, valuation and risk; no single ratio establishes a recommendation.
Harbor rises from 900 to 1,000 million revenue, an 11.1% increase. If 90 of current revenue comes from a newly included acquisition, the continuing business contributes 910—only 10 above the prior 900, about 1.1%.
The acquisition may still add value, but that is a different thesis requiring its purchase price and returns. The graph separates prior, continuing and total revenue.
Vertical: Revenue (USD millions)
Horizontal: Prior / continuing business / current total
| Prior / continuing business / current total | Fictional example |
|---|---|
| 1 | 900 |
| 2 | 910 |
| 3 | 1,000 |
Calling acquisition-driven growth organic builds valuation on the wrong driver. Ignoring the acquisition's capital cost overstates value creation.
Try the question before revealing its answer. These are reading checks, not trading certification or a site completion record.
Approximately 1.1%.
(1,000−90−900)/900.
Calling acquisition-driven growth organic builds valuation on the wrong driver. Ignoring the acquisition's capital cost overstates value creation.
Explain this risk before treating the example as a decision rule. A correct calculation does not guarantee a favorable market outcome.
Return to the question: How much growth is repeatable? State the observed facts, the assumptions and the failure condition separately.
External references support definitions and conventions. Worked scenarios and prose are original. No current quotes or dealer inventory are claimed.
Read this lesson as Markdown · Download its JavaScript content module